The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment and six months) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal: ① the Defendant appears to have lived faithfully without being subject to any criminal punishment until eight years have passed since entering the domestic university at around 2004 after entering the Republic of Korea; ② the current economic difficulty seems to exist; ③ the other party to the Defendant’s crime of delivery of the instant penphone is the Korean police; ③ the other party to the Defendant’s crime of delivery of the instant penphone is the Korean police; ④ the Defendant is against the wrongness while committing the crime.

However, on the other hand, the crime of this case was committed in two times, ① the accomplice F (a person who was released domestically and subject to criminal punishment because of being detected) who supplies phiphones in China, has received and purchased the phiphones in two times, and some of the phiphones purchased are administered and delivered to a third party, and the crime of this case is virtually constitutes an import of narcotics in a foreign country. ② The crime of this case seems to have occurred continuously and repeatedly for profit, ② the crime of this case seems to have occurred continuously and repeatedly for profit, ③ the location of the phiphones purchased by the defendant was not revealed, and on the record, the defendant was able to expand the object and scope of the phiphones. ④ The defendant has a large potential risk to this society by spreading phiphones, ④ all favorable circumstances in relation to the defendant, ④ the judgment of the court below, and there is no change in circumstances or circumstances that can be favorable to the defendant's sentencing, ⑤ the defendant's environment, and ⑤ the circumstances and circumstances.