1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,160,300,700 among the Plaintiffs and KRW 201,00,000 among them, shall be from July 2, 2016 to 959,300.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”)

(B) The Plaintiff’s Debtor B’s administrator of the Plaintiff’s Debtor B’s lawsuit (mutual name was changed in sequence to E, D, and B, and hereinafter “Plaintiff B” in total before and after the mutual change.

The Defendant’s “H Corporation” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Corporation”) shall be the F and G members of Chuncheon City, a procuring entity.

(2) The joint supply and demand organization (hereinafter referred to as the “joint supply and demand organization of this case”) represented by the Plaintiff A to perform the work under contract.

(2) On December 26, 2005, the instant joint contractors concluded a contract for construction works between the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea with the total construction amount of KRW 29,125,689,253 and the total construction period of KRW 1,860 (hereinafter “instant contract”).

3) General conditions of the construction contract incorporated under the instant contract (hereinafter “instant general conditions”)

The main contents of the attached Form shall be as follows.

1. As stated in the general terms of this case, the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, which were enforced at the time of entering into the instant contract, are attached hereto.

2. The entry into the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

B. Although the instant contract was amended due to a long-term continuing construction contract, the total construction amount was KRW 29,125,689,253, and the total construction period was 1,860 from December 28, 2005 to December 1, 2005, the contract was concluded several times, and the contract was finally concluded, and the total construction period was extended to 36,693,000,000, and the final completion date was changed on November 26, 2015 to 3,621, and the specific changes were made.

3. The details of the amendment to the contract of this case are as indicated;

(hereinafter referred to as "contracts by the number of teas") by the sequences of execution of contracts by the number of teas.

On December 30, 2014, Plaintiff A filed an application with the Defendant for the contract amount of construction expenses additionally paid by the Plaintiffs due to the extension of the total construction period of the instant construction works.