1. On May 31, 2013, the Defendant’s officially assessed individual land price in the year 2013 is one square meter for Daejeon Seo-gu B 2,385 square meters.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of Daejeon Sung-gu Daejeon District B 2,385 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. On May 31, 2012, the Defendant selected the area of 1,481 square meters prior to Daejeon Seo-gu as a reference land, and decided and publicly announced the officially assessed individual land price as of January 1, 2012 as KRW 349,000 per 1 square meter.

C. Since then, the Defendant changed the standard land price of the instant land from the said land to the Daejeon Seodong 2,371 square meters (hereinafter “the standard land price of this case”), and on May 31, 2013, the Defendant determined and publicly announced the officially assessed individual land price of the instant land as of January 1, 2013 as KRW 195,000 per square meter.

On June 26, 2013, the Plaintiff submitted a written objection to the officially assessed individual land price to the Defendant.

E. On July 29, 2013, the Sung-gu Real Estate Appraisal Commission accepted the appraiser’s verification result that the surface of the instant land is not a fluoral land, but a fluoral land, and deliberated on the determination of the officially announced value of the instant land as KRW 219,00,000. The Defendant notified the Plaintiff on July 29, 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant's decision and public notice of the officially assessed individual land price of May 31, 2013 changed to "219,000 won" is "decision of the officially assessed individual land price of this case".

(f) On October 30, 2013, the Plaintiffs filed an administrative appeal against the revocation of the instant individual land price determination with the Daejeon Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission, but was dismissed on January 27, 2014. 【Ground for Recognition” in the absence of any dispute, and the purport of the entire pleadings and arguments as indicated in Articles 2, 3, 4, 2, and 8 (if there is a serial number, each of the several numbers, and the purport of the entire pleadings and arguments.

2. Whether the determination of the officially assessed individual land price of this case is lawful

A. In calculating the officially assessed individual land price of the instant land in the past, the Defendant: (a) selected the 1,481 square meters prior to Daejeon Seosung-gu as the reference land price; and (b) selected Daejeon Seosung-gu D 2,371 square meters as the reference land price when determining the officially assessed individual land price of the instant case.

However, the reference land for the land of this case is on the main road.