logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.08.25 2015나13499
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this case are added to the following judgments, and it is identical to the judgment of the court of first instance except where the second 7 line "the second 12th 7th son" of the judgment of the court of first instance is "the starting date", thereby citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【Supplementary part] The plaintiff asserts that the money that the judgment of the first instance court ordered payment (as approximately KRW 10 million) transferred to D by the defendant to D, this part of the defendant's counterclaim should be dismissed.

It is insufficient to recognize that the record of Gap 21 certificate alone had the assignment of claims as alleged by the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to deem otherwise.

We cannot accept this part of the Plaintiff’s assertion.

2. The judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow