logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.04.01 2014나40524
양수금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion asserts that the Defendant should pay the above amount to the Plaintiff, on June 17, 2013, since the Plaintiff acquired 43,000,000 won out of the claims under the purchase contract of May 20, 2013 against the Defendant on the purchase of goods from A.

2. The judgment is not sufficient to recognize that A, the transferor, has a claim against the Defendant, as alleged by the Plaintiff, solely on the basis of the entries in Gap's evidence Nos. 5 and 9, the testimony and the testimony of the witness B of the first instance trial, the witness of the first instance trial, and the written appraisal by the appraiser C, and it is insufficient to recognize that A, the transferor, notified the Defendant of the assignment of the claim or consented to it, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow