The defendant shall be innocent.

1. In the facts charged, the Defendant resided in the C Apartment No. 103 408, 103, 408, and the victim D (Inn, 53 years old) had conflict with the noise problem between ordinary stories.

On February 29, 2012, at around 20:40 on February 29, 2012, the Defendant heard the sound from the victim’s father to the mixed standards due to cerebral cerebral macy disorder, and generated noise by cutting the floor of the Defendant’s house.

As above, the victim heard the sound that the defendant pays, and found the door of the defendant's house, and the defendant immediately opened the door, and threatened the victim with the kitchen knife, which is a dangerous thing on the part of the ship of the victim, and "the deceased".

2. There are statements in the victim D and E investigation agency, the husband of the victim, and in this court, each of the evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case.

The victim D consistently stated to the effect that “I have consistently accumulated the Defendant’s apartment labels without any speech, and the front door, immediately string the kitchen knick, and the Defendant stated that “I have called “I have died” while putting the kitchen knick.

그러나 찾아 온 사람이 누구인지 모르는 상황에서 협박을 하기 위하여 피고인이 부엌칼을 들고 나왔다는 것은 상식에 비추어 납득하기 어려운 점, 층간 소음 문제로 갈등이 있었다고 하더라도 피고인과 피해자 사이에 폭행, 모욕, 협박 등 형사처벌의 대상이 될 만한 행동이 한 번도 없었던 상황에서 피고인이 부엌칼로 협박했다는 것 역시 경험칙에 반하는 점, 피해자는 피고인이 왼손으로 현관문을 잡아 당겨 열고 오른손에 든 부엌칼을 들이댔다고 진술하나 피고인의 아파트 현관문은 아파트 안에서 밖으로 밀어서 여는 구조로 되어있는 점 등을 종합하면 D의 진술을 믿기 어렵고, D으로부터 위와 같은 말을 전해들은 데 불과한 E의 진술도 믿기 어렵다.

Therefore, each of the above evidence alone is the same.