1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On November 11, 2003, the Plaintiff first entered the Republic of Korea as an industrial trainee (D-3) and returned to the Republic of Korea on October 23, 2006, and filed an application for refugee recognition with the Defendant on March 30, 201, while he/she re-entered into the Republic of Korea for a non-professional employment visa (E-9) and was staying there on March 30, 201.

On April 28, 2015, the Defendant issued a disposition to permit the Plaintiff to stay humanitarianly (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute “a well-founded fear that she would suffer from persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Refugee Convention and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol, and the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status cannot be ruled out entirely the possibility that the Plaintiff would suffer disadvantage when she returns home.

【Ground of recognition” did not have any dispute, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition as stated in Gap’s 1-3 evidence, Eul’s 1-3 evidence, and Eul’s 1-3 evidence, and the Plaintiff joined a youth department’s activities and regional leaders’ letter around the end of 2006 (hereinafter “B party”).

In addition, after re-entry into the Republic of Korea on March 30, 2011, the representatives of the branch offices of the Republic of Korea of the B political party were responsible for active activities such as public relations activities, election campaigns, and participation in the defense events representing B political parties.

On January 3, 2014, however, after the Cambodia's U.S. Franchissis incident, Synishland is light in Magnish and strengthens the suppression against B political parties. The Plaintiff's personal information and the contents of B political party activities in the Republic of Korea are known in Cambodia, and the government of Cambodia and police are threatening to arrest the Plaintiff if the Plaintiff returned to Cambodia due to the Plaintiff's attention.

Therefore, in the event that the plaintiff returns to Cambodia, due to the work experience as a Bparty representative in Korea, the Cambodian Government will be stuffed.