beta
Text
1. The defendant,
A. Each money recorded in the corresponding total sum of the cited amount in the attached Form to Plaintiffs A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, and K, and it.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
(a) Business title - Business title - Business title : LA redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter “instant project”): Defendant - Business execution site - Seoul Mapo-gu M (hereinafter “Maintenance Zone”) - Project implementation authorization: N publicly notified in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on November 25, 2009
B. The Plaintiffs owned and resided in the relevant location indicated in the “real estate location” column in the attached list, which is within the improvement zone.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 3, 5, 7-9, 12-14, 18, 20, 21 (including additional numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Assertion and determination
A. The defendant claiming the plaintiffs is obligated to pay the amount in the separate sheet corresponding to the total sum of the claim amount in the separate sheet as the total amount of resettlement funds, housing relocation expenses, and director expenses to the plaintiffs who are subject to cash settlement.
B. Determination 1) Where the articles of incorporation or management and disposal plan of a project implementer as to whether a project implementer is a person subject to cash settlement requires members to conclude a contract for sale in cash within a certain period after the expiration of the period for application for sale in lots, and the purport of the contract is determined to liquidate its rights in cash, it is additionally granted an opportunity for a project implementer to leave the project by refusing to conclude the contract for sale in lots within the pertinent period to the owner of land, etc. who was a member of the project implementer. Thus, even if the owner of the land, etc. who has filed the application for sale in lots refuses the contract for sale in lots or the project implementer clearly expresses that he/she does not intend to conclude the contract for sale in lots after the expiration of the period for application for sale in lots, the owner of the relevant land, etc. shall be deemed the person subject to cash settlement (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2013Du4293, Aug. 26, 2014; 208Da91364, Jul. 28, 2011