2011Gohap500 Murder, homicide, and homicides

Sung-○ (69 - 1)

Magsan-si, Magsan-gu

Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government

He/she may file prosecutions (prosecutions) and soldiers (public trial)

Law Firm Kangn, Attorney Lee Dong-soo, Counsel for the defendant-appellant

February 15, 2012

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for fifteen years.

one inserted in seizure (No. 3) shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as an engineer of the furniture, was aware of the victim Lee ○, who was in a singing room around January 30, 201 and was divorced from each other. On May 24, 2011, the Defendant married on and around May 24, 2011, and lived together with the victim’s home. The Defendant often disputed with the victim’s reputation due to economic problems, such as not paying money.

1. homicide;

On October 6, 2011: around 09:20, the Defendant: (a) while smoking tobacco at the dwelling space located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Geumcheon-gu, the Defendant would divorce if the victim was able to bring money. (b) The Defendant collected fluore fluoring fluor who was under TV with the complaint fluoring so that the victim would be able to do so one time; (c) the victim fluoring the back head of the victim under TV; (d) the fluoring fluoring and fluoring the victim over the floor, and (d) the fluoring fluoring of the victim, and (d) the fluoring fluoring of the victim, she died of the victim. (d) The Defendant would die the victim after she died of the victim's fluoring with the victim's brush, so that the victim died within the toilet.

2. Concealment of carcasses;

The defendant murdered the victim as stated in paragraph (1) on the same day: 14:00 on the same day, and 14:00 days after the victim's body was cleaned and taken clothes, and the defendant ○○○OOOOOOOO's body was laid on the back seat of the back seat of the passenger car and passed through Jinju-si, Gohap-gun. The defendant moved the victim's body to the bitle-gun, and was accommodated in Daegu-si where the victim's body was moved to the bitle of the vehicle.

On October 7, 2011, 09: around 00, the following day after the Defendant 14: around 00, the Defendant sold the land to ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○, Sim-si, Sim-si, and covered the victim’s body by inserting it into the victim’s body.

Accordingly, the defendant concealed the body of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of the witness ○○;

1. Each police statement on 00, 00, 00, 000, and 00;

1. Protocol of inspection;

1. Each protocol and list of seizure;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. A written autopsy report, a written autopsy report (written autopsy), and a written autopsy and appraisal report;

1. Marriage relation certificate:

1. All on-site photographs;

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Article 250(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of murder and the choice of limited imprisonment) and Article 161(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of harboring the corpse)

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes;

Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act / [Aggravation of concurrent crimes with punishment heavier than punishment (within the scope of adding up the long-term punishments of the above two crimes)]

1. Confiscation;

In light of Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act and Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, even though the defendant was found to have killed the victim by contingently, the defendant tried to conceal the victim's cell phone at the scene of the crime, and tried to use the victim's cell phone at the scene of the crime, and continued to commit the crime, despite the victim's desire to live at the scene of his/her view, the crime is very poor in light of the circumstances of the crime, methods and contents, etc., the crime is very poor; the victim's body is concealed after murder; the victim already went together with the defendant; the victim's relative and relatives were sent a large number of text messages as if the victim had been traveling together with the defendant; the victim's cell phone was laid down and it was impossible to resist at all, and the defendant tried to kill the victim by taking into account his/her basic opinion about the crime, such as murdering life, and the fact that he/she did not use the victim's credit card treatment in an entertainment bar, etc., and the sentencing criteria should be determined in full view of the defendant's act.

Jurors's verdict and Sentencing's verdict on guilty and not guilty

5 jury guilty guilty opinion on the sentencing of all jurors

Imprisonment with prison labor for 20 years: 15 years: Imprisonment with prison labor for 2 years: one person; 10 years; one person;

Judges Kim Yong-hoon

Guide Association

Moveed year