Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 8, 2014, the Defendant appeared and testified as a witness at the trial of the Defendant case against the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (afford) as to 2013 high-class 98 high-ranking 98 of the above court at the court of law No. 101, May 8, 2014, the Defendant of “2016 high-class 407” means that “I do not make an investment in the Defendant D on January 1, 2004 and own the real estate as it is, if he did not own the real estate, he would have known that the market price of the real estate was high and that he would have made a profit equivalent to the market increase,” and “I do not have any such doubt.”

“The answer was made.”

However, in fact, when the defendant sold E-dong land owned by the defendant to lend money to D, and it was difficult to recover the money borrowed thereafter, the defendant suffered loss even though he could enjoy profit from the market price increase due to the land price increase if he owned the land as it is. Accordingly, D demanded preservation and prepared a loan certificate of KRW 1.275 million on January 1, 2004, and around that time, D did not lend KRW 1.275 million to D.

Accordingly, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and presented perjury (as recognized by evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it is difficult to believe that D, as of January 1, 2004, borrowed a loan certificate of KRW 1.488 billion from the Defendant (hereinafter “loan certificate”) and a loan certificate of KRW 1.275 million from the Defendant (hereinafter “B loan certificate”) are separate from the loan certificate of KRW 1.275 million. In addition, as the loan certificate was prepared, if the loan certificate was not destroyed, the loan certificate of KRW 1 is replaced by the loan certificate of KRW 1.48,000,000,000, in fact, prior to January 1, 2004.