1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a company that officially sells wide halog vehicles, which are imported vehicles, and engages in the business of repairing and maintaining the said vehicles. The defendant is a public broadcasting company for the purpose of broadcasting business and cultural service business.

B. The background and coverage 1) B of the news report: (a) on December 2014, 2014, the Plaintiff’s point of origin for the halog CDI 2.0 TPP vehicles (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

(B) purchase of the present vehicle during September 2015, October 2015, and December 2015; (c) symptoms not accelerated by the present vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “instant symptoms”).

2) B found the symptoms of this case and requested the halogen Korea Consumer Support Center to deliver them and take measures such as repair.

The person in charge of the above customer support center announced B that B had talked about the test vehicle at the Changwon Shalogen Service Center and received inspection.

B, on December 7, 2015, the instant vehicle was put into the Changwon halogen Service Center, and the operator of the said Service Center inspected the instant vehicle, but did not find the cause for the instant symptoms.

The Plaintiff asserts that on December 7, 2015, B intended to enter the instant vehicle into the service center without any reservation, and that if the employee in charge of the service center enters the instant vehicle into the pre-contract to B, B provided guidance that the repair is impossible on the day due to the pre-contracted vehicle, B was connected only to the instant vehicle, and that B was released immediately without requesting the repair of the instant vehicle because there was no symptoms, even though the person in charge had connected the instant vehicle with the diagnostic machine, B did not have any symptoms.

However, there is no other evidence to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s above assertion, and instead, in full view of the purport of the entries and arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 and 3, B above the instant vehicle upon the recommendation of the customer support center.