Defendant

All appeals filed by A and C and prosecutor are dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Defendant

Each document submitted by the counsel of A and C after the lapse of the period for filing a statement of grounds of appeal shall be considered to the extent of supplement in case of legitimate grounds of appeal.

However, Defendant A and C’s defense counsel asserted that the grounds for appeal are erroneous facts and unfair sentencing on the date of the first instance trial, but in light of the specific grounds for appeal and the content of the allegation, etc., it is determined that the grounds for appeal are included in the misapprehension of legal principles. Accordingly, Defendant A and C’s defense counsel asserted that the grounds for appeal are erroneous and unreasonable.

Defendant

A In the pertinent item, “Defendant” shall be referred to as “Defendant” and the other Defendants shall specify only in their name.

The same shall also apply to other Defendants.

The defendant, whether to grant KRW 9.5 million (in relation to the misunderstanding of facts and the misunderstanding of legal principles) shall be paid two to three times a year with C and one year, and the meal expenses, taxi expenses, and proxy expenses (in relation to the misappropriation) paid by C, shall be hereinafter referred to as "agent expenses").

There is a fact that one time to KRW 10-200,000 has been paid in cash to C more than three to four times, and there is no fact that 9.5 million won has been paid as stated in this part of the facts charged.

With respect to the Defendant’s delivery of KRW 9.5 million to C, there is no objective data, such as account books stating the details thereof or the account details of the Defendant’s account, and only the details that C deposited cash in its account at the time and time specified in this part of the facts charged, and there is no evidence that the Defendant met C at the time and place specified in this part of the facts charged.

Therefore, evidence that corresponds to the fact that the defendant delivered KRW 9.5 million to C is the only statement of C, and C is the victim E company.

The F Headquarters Examination Team shall be referred to as the "victim Company Examination Team".

A statement made in the process of the audit is due to parliamentary or strong pressure, and a statement made in the prosecutor's office is about 3 to 4 years, and it is correct to memory.