The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal does not contain any injury by assaulting D.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts and legal principles.

2. 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 피해자 D은 수사기관에서 원심 법정에 이르기까지 일관하여 피고인이 피해자의 머리채를 잡아당기고, 피해자의 몸통을 손으로 때리고 발로 찼다고

A statement is made; ② On July 11, 2014, the fact that the police was killed on the victim’s right bridge, etc. from the photo taken by the police around 05:00 on July 11, 2014, the fact that the victim was killed on the victim’s right bridge, etc.

In the circumstance of claiming that the defendant first reported to the police, it is difficult to see that the credibility of the victim's statement is deteriorated, and 4. The witness F of the original trial witness F was assaulted by the victim.

Whether there was a circumstance to see, it is not easy to see whether there was a appearance, and whether there was a hole, and that at the time the defendant and the victim were in contact with each other.

It was discussed that

In full view of the facts stated in the judgment below, it is difficult to view that the content of the statement is in conflict with the statement of the victim that the defendant was assaulted by the defendant. In full view of the fact that the defendant, like the facts stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below, obtained the victim's head debt, lost the victim's body body body, and caused the victim's 14-day treatment for approximately 14 days, etc., the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. Conclusion.