1. The plaintiff's appeal and the additional selective claims filed by this court are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, except where the plaintiff added a judgment on the selective claims added by this court, and thus, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional determination

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff lent KRW 12,500,000 to the defendant's husband C, which is a daily living obligation, and the defendant must pay KRW 12,50,000 jointly with C.

B. It is not sufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff lent KRW 12,50,000 to C solely on the basis of each of the evidence Nos. 12 and 13, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Even if the Plaintiff lent KRW 12,500,00 to C, there is no evidence to regard the said loan as a daily household obligation between C and the Defendant.

3. The Plaintiff’s claim for repayment of loan must be dismissed on the ground that there is no reasonable ground.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s claim for joint liability due to the Plaintiff’s daily home life, which was selectively added by this court, is dismissed.