A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. From April 25, 2019 to 20:00 on April 25, 2019, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s main points and damaged the air conditioners and air conditioners by force for about 15 minutes, such as interfering with the business of the victim from around 20:00 to around 20:15, the victim’s Cheongyang-gun Data in the operation of the victim C, and the victim’s shouldered himself who was divingd from the shock of the main points, and cutting the beer’s disease on the floor and cutting the air condition and air conditioners.

2. On April 25, 2019, at around 20:20 on April 25, 2019, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender with obstruction of performance of official duties, injury, and arrest of the victim F (54 years old), a member of the Cheongyang Police Station E district unit, who was called to the site after having reported that the Defendant 112 was frighting down due to alcohol, and was arrested from G circumstances as a flagrant offender with obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant took one-time parts of the victim’s face face with his arms on which the Defendant was frightened, and took about two weeks back to the victim, and put about the victim’s booming part of the head, with approximately two weeks of treatment.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H, C, and F;

1. Investigation report (specific description of the amount of damage caused by property damage);

1. Statement of opinion;

1. On-site photographs (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the crime. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, it is recognized that the defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the crime, but it does not seem to have been in a state where the defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to drinking, and thus,

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act of this Act concerning criminal facts.