logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.01.29 2014가단6852
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff entered the department of sports-for-all guidance at B University as new students in 2013.

B. At the beginning of March of each year, the above department received face-to-face meals from a general meeting of departments and new students, and the face-to-face meals were collected by new students and students, and new students voluntarily introduced the cancer report and read the out-to-face language report in advance, and held a long-term wave.

C. Around March 4, 2013, the Plaintiff was gathered from other new students, vessel, and lecture room to prepare for the above face-to-face meeting. At the time, the Plaintiff was able to listen to serious pointed out and verbal abuse from C, a second-class vessel, on the ground that the Plaintiff was engaged in chromatic and serious cremation.

Around that time, the Plaintiff was forced the father D to comply with the above facts and the part of the Plaintiff’s father (“the father”) to comply with the 6 provisions of the Department, such as “The restaurant, the kitchen, and the store in the latter part of the Mad. Mad. Mad, the store in the future, etc. are always prohibited from entering and leaving a mobile phone. They are forced not only within the school but also within the street in the public city. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad

E. Around March 5, 2013, D calls to E and the president of the Department, who is the assistant instructors of the Department, to point out the problems of the regulations on facts and departments that the Plaintiff made verbal abuse from C.

F. Accordingly, E told C to say that students having difficulties during the preparation period for face-to-face meal events are strong and verbal abuse is not conducted, and the president of the department asked C to leave a face-to-face meeting to the autonomous doctor of new students and to not force C to attend the meeting.

After that, the plaintiff was unable to participate in a face-to-face meeting by the chairperson of the department.

G. D calls to E at the end of March 2013, 2013, saying that the Plaintiff was unable to participate in a face-to-face meeting, and that he was subject to bullying from other students.

H. Meanwhile, F, the Plaintiff’s academic motive, was sexually sexually recorded on the Plaintiff at his/her home at the end of March, 2013.

arrow