logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.11.13 2014고정590
공정증서원본불실기재등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Although there was no resolution of the general meeting of shareholders and the board of directors with the content that C was dismissed from office directors and auditors and appointed new inside directors and auditors, the Defendant, on October 2, 2012, submitted an application for registration of change with the content that C In-house Directors D, E, and Auditor F, was dismissed, and that G and H were appointed as auditor, and submitted to the public official in charge, whose name cannot be known at the Seoul Central District Court located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court on October 2, 2012.

2. Around that time, the Defendant had the Defendant keep the register containing false facts as stated in the above 1. Paragraph (1) above, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copy of application for registration of change;

1. Application of statutes, such as a copy of minutes of shareholders' meeting;

1. Articles 228 (1), 229, and 228 (1) of the Criminal Act (which means the exercise of the original of an authentic deed) concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The Defendant is a person who works as the representative director of the victim C in the seventh floor of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from May 16, 2012 to November 6, 2012 and has been engaged in general operations such as fund execution and management.

On September 10, 2012, the Defendant concluded a stem cell supply contract with the company under the name of K, on behalf of the representative director of K and one’s own wife.

At the time, C's shares were owned most by K, but each corporation's corporate personality is separate, so it is financial support to the parent company of the subsidiary company.

arrow