A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

C around April 9, 2015, from around April 9, 2015 to May 19, 2015, from “E Gameland” located in Seo-gu, Daegu to run an illegal game forum, such as providing 25 million won for the purchase of the game machine of “E Gameland” and introducing employees H, thereby facilitating the commission of the crime, such as providing 25 million won for the purchase of the game machine of “E Gameland” and introducing employees H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness C and I's respective legal statements;

1. Application of one copy of the written text of the complainant and the suspect, and one copy of the telephone call and text of the suspect;

1. Article 44(1)2 and Article 32(1)7 of the former Act on the Promotion of Game Industry (Amended by Act No. 13955, Feb. 3, 2016); Article 32(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts;

1. Article 32 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 (Accessories) of the Criminal Act mitigated by Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act include: (a) the following circumstances; (b) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, family relationship, family environment; (c) motive and means of the crime; and (d) the circumstances after the crime, etc.; and (b) the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments.

Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant does not recognize his mistake.

The defendant has been subject to criminal punishment for 6 times for the crime of double-class.

The defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime.

The defendant's participation in the illegal game of this case as an aiding and abetting crime in exchange for money is relatively weak.