1. C’s statement of mediation established on July 5, 2004 is based on the Seoul Central District Court case No. 2004Na4699 against the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff asserts that, as the cause of the instant claim, KRW 5 million is the Bank, and KRW 1 million is the Bank in cash, and that all obligations ordered under the instant conciliation protocol were repaid, and that compulsory execution pursuant to the instant conciliation protocol is rejected.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the plaintiff shall be paid KRW 600,000 to Eul on July 5, 2004, and KRW 1 million until August 30, 2004, KRW 100,000 until August 31, 2004, KRW 100,000 until September 30, 2004, KRW 100,000 and KRW 100,000 until October 29, 2004, KRW 100,000 until December 30, 2004, KRW 100,000 per annum to the plaintiff on July 1, 204, the plaintiff shall be paid KRW 100,000 per annum to the plaintiff on December 31, 204.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit.