logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.10.12 2017나30523
약정금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is as follows: (a) the first instance court: (b) dismissed the “Policeman on May 9, 2015” of the third and nine Myeon 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance as “Policeman on May 2014; and (c) except for the following determination as to the assertion added by the Defendant in this court, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of

(However, the defendant's additional determination on February 2, 200, asserts that there was an implied agreement that the plaintiff would no longer hold the defendant liable for any liability arising from the instant undertaking as a result of changes in the circumstances anticipated at the time of the preparation of the instant undertaking, such as the defendant's failure to continue to operate K after the preparation of the instant undertaking, but the defendant's assertion is without merit, since there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow