logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.08.09 2017고단1085 (1)
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 22, 2017, from around 01:17 to 01:25 on the same day, the Defendant, at the E convenience store operated by the victim D in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, from around 01:17 to around 01:25, the Defendant, without any particular reason, expressed to the F, an employee of Guro-gu, the Defendant: (a) expressed his desire to friencate, death, and sound, and (b) friencing the Defendant out of the convenience store; and (c) even if other customers again presented the Defendant out of the convenience store, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store operation by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A statement prepared in F;

1. Application of the CDA-TV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant with reason for sentencing of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act repeats the same crime, and committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period due to interference with business affairs.

On the other hand, the degree of force of the defendant's use of CCTV images revealed is not severe.

G and convenience store employees who are in depth divided, and in fact operate convenience store for victims, F have not been punished for defendants.

In light of these circumstances, the punishment is determined as ordered by Article 51 of the Criminal Act.

arrow