The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around June 14, 2016, the Defendant made a patent insult of the victim by stating that “Dreging was sent to the Defendant,” “Negy, snick, snick, snick, snick, snick, snick, snick,” “I snick, hick, hick,” “I snick, hick, hick,” and “I snick, hick,” and “I snick, snick, snick,” and “I snick, snick,” and “I snick, snick,” and openly insulting the victim.

2. We examine the judgment. It is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when a complaint is filed pursuant to Article 312(1). According to the written agreement bound in the records of the public trial of this case, the victim can recognize the fact that the complaint was cancelled against the defendant on December 16, 2016, which is the date of the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.