logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2018.07.06 2018고정55
상해
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

Parts of innocence

1. Around October 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 08:15, the Defendant: (b) called the victim C (34 tax) who was the owner of the vehicle due to the difficulty in cleaning the vehicle due to parking in front of 14-8, 210, Seosan employment welfare displayers, which was around 14-8, to a citizen of Seosan-si; (c) and (d) brought a dispute with the victim on the problem of parking; (d) the Defendant was able to ask the victim C (34 years of age) to move the vehicle; (e) the victim’s inside part of the body of the victim was the head; and (e) the victim was able to suffer from the injury of the victim, such as dives, spawn, etc., among the water parts requiring treatment for a period of up to three weeks.

2. As to the causal relationship between the victim's bodily injury and the Defendant's assault act (the act of taking the part of the victim's bodily injury into head and breath of dub).

A. According to the evidence examined by this court, the following circumstances are acknowledged.

① Following the instant case, the victim made a statement at an investigative agency only stating that “the victim gets satisf and satn with satisf and satn with satisfs” as the content of damage.

After the lapse of one month from the police, he was investigated again by the police at the time of the accident and stated about the injury of the fingers.

In a single court, a statement was made to the effect that “the defendant kicked, plucked, and plucked, not the defendant, but the defendant spawnd, by spawning the defendant.”

② The finger injury is a serious damage to the extent that it needs to be treated for three weeks, and the part of the body or balp bage is a minor damage that does not require any particular treatment.

If the actual loss was caused by the defendant, it is difficult to understand that the victim did not make a statement of the damage from the beginning.

③ At the time of the instant case, when a person was engaged in flapsing from the Defendant, flapsing the Defendant’s hand, flapsing the Defendant’s left hand, plucking and breaking up the Defendant’s hand, and then, flapsing.

arrow