The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is those who were enrolled in the second year in the social welfare department of B University.

At around 16:00 on December 10, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim, on the ground that the victim E (n.e., 20 years of age) who franced the coffee at the next place in the coffee “D” smoking room located in the public city in the public city in the public city, did not go to his seat, and did not go to his seat, and on the ground that he did not go to his seat, “I do not have to do so, it is difficult to do so.”

2. We examine the judgment dismissing the public prosecution, and the above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant on January 14, 2014, after the prosecution of this case was instituted, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.