logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.14 2016구합67142
감봉처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s disciplinary action against the Plaintiff on March 30, 2016 shall be revoked for three months of salary reduction.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 1, 1993, the Plaintiff was appointed as a local civil engineering assistant on December 1, 1993, and on May 2, 2012, the Plaintiff was promoted to the local facilities department, and served on the road with the traffic safety department B from November 5, 2012 (hereinafter “traffic road station”) and served as a staff member of the C Team (hereinafter “C Team”).

B. On January 4, 2013, the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration publicly announced the development and recruitment of subjects to support D projects (hereinafter “instant public announcement”) pursuant to Article 4 of the Operational Guidelines for Small and Medium Enterprise Technology Development Support Projects.

C. On February 18, 2013, the Plaintiff prepared a written request for project proposal (hereinafter “written request for project proposal”) as the proposer of the “E” task (hereinafter “E”), according to the instant public notice, and submitted it to the president of the H Foundation under the name of the Defendant, with the approval of the head of the road division F and the approval of the head of the traffic safety bureau and the approval of the head of the traffic safety bureau.

On June 3, 2013, the Director of the Korea Industrial Technology Management Institute notified the Defendant of the results of selecting I Co., Ltd. I (hereinafter “the instant major institution”) as the major institution in charge of the instant task, and requested the Defendant to implement follow-up tasks, such as concluding agreements with the major institution.

E. On June 6, 2013, the Plaintiff prepared a “J” in accordance with the foregoing notification, and received approval from the head of the policy development team K, L Library M (Ler of the instant C Team), the director of the traffic safety bureau, G, N, and the Defendant’s agent.

F. On June 7, 2013, the Plaintiff issued to the representative director of the instant major institution a written contract for technology development (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Defendant’s official seal affixed thereon, and theO affixed the said written contract.

G. On August 11, 2014, the president of the Korea Industrial Technology Evaluation and Management Institute notifies the Defendant of the result of evaluating the instant task as “sexuality” and the result of development within three months from the end of the development period.

arrow