1. The defendant has the plaintiff at the head office or the storage place of each register of shareholders listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

1. Basic facts

A. The party status 1) Defendant Daelim Industrial Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”)

(2) The Plaintiff is a stock-listed corporation that is engaged in civil engineering, construction, industrial environmental facilities, electricity, heating, sanitation, machinery, road packing, and other construction business. (2) The Plaintiff is an organization that holds 10 shares of the Defendant Company.

(A) Evidence No. 1). (b)

1) The Defendant Company imposed penalty surcharges on the Defendant Company 1) along with other construction companies in the course of tendering several construction projects as listed in the following table: (a) the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (amended by Act No. 11406, Mar. 21, 2012; (b) the Fair Trade Act (hereinafter “Fair Trade Act”).

() The Defendant Company was ordered to pay penalty surcharges on the ground that it committed an unfair collaborative act under Article 19(1) (Evidence A4 through 8). The amount of penalty surcharges on the date of issuing an order to order to work the 14th class River Construction Work, which was the first class of penalty surcharges on August 31, 2012, which was KRW 22.548 billion on August 31, 2012, Incheon Urban Railroad 200 million, which was KRW 6.827 billion on February 25, 2014, which was KRW 3,000,000,000 KRW 14.95 billion on April 201, 2014, which was against the Plaintiff’s 14.5 billion on the ground that the Plaintiff filed an administrative lawsuit against the Plaintiff’s 14th class of shareholders on the ground that it was unreasonable to impose penalty surcharges on the Plaintiff’s 14th class of shareholders on the grounds that it was against the Plaintiff’s 2015th class of argument.

(A) No. 8, D.

On July 22, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a claim for the perusal of the Plaintiff’s actual shareholder registry.