logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.11.28 2017가단10384
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B, among the real estate strata listed in the separate sheet Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 3, respectively, indicated in the separate sheet No. 1.

Reasons

1. The description corresponding to each defendant of the grounds for the attachment of the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Applicable provisions;

A. Defendant B and C submitted a documentary evidence on October 26, 2017 without submitting a separate preparatory document. However, Defendant C was present at the date of pleading and stated that the deposit amount of KRW 40,000,000, which was confirmed in the relevant pre-tax contract was already returned by the lessor, and did not make a statement to the effect that the Plaintiff did not dispute the Plaintiff’s claim, and thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion is deemed to have been led to confession.

D and each F confession judgment (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)

B. Defendant E-Service by Publication (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

arrow