(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.08.09 2018고정277

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.08.09 2018고정277

업무방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 27, 2017, at around 20:0, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbances for about one hour, such as: (a) the victim C (n, 49 years of age) in Suwon-gu, Busan; (b) the victim C (n, fing, 49 years of age) who works for this employee; (c) the brealy breabed B, and the breabed B, without any justifiable reason after drinking; and (d) repeating the breab by placing the breab on the hand floor; and (c) throwing the physical disease of the drinking branch on the floor; and (d) preventing them from entering the restaurant, and thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and duly adopted by the court, the Defendant’s investigation report, customer order receipt (in the event of crime), investigation report (in the event of CCTV attachment analysis), site photo, investigation report (CCTV attachment and time error), CCTV image photograph [the Defendant and his defense counsel] to the effect that the Defendant did not interfere with the above restaurant business at the time of the instant case, but the obstruction of business is likely to interfere with the business. However, the crime of interference is likely to occur when the Defendant did not actually interfere with the business, and the CCTV was duly adopted and investigated. Examining the CCTV image taken by the court below, the Defendant entered the above restaurant without any justifiable reason by making the boomer enter the restaurant with the upper floor of the table, and repeated it with the table’s hand, without any reason, and repeated it with the table’s hand, and the Defendant did not enter the restaurant, and the Defendant’s act was not deemed to have been committed by the Defendant’s customer or his act in the above restaurant.

Even if such an act causes the risk of interfering with the business of the above restaurant.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2018.11.08 2018노2968

-광주지방법원 2018.02.20 2017고단5605

-부산지방법원 2017.02.22 2015고단8558

-인천지방법원 2016.01.20 2015고합553

-수원지방법원 2017.09.14 2017고정1878