logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.01.13 2016고정691
도박
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 19, 2016, the Defendant, along with C, D, and E, committed the instant “G” room located in Jeju Island on 19:25, Jan. 19, 2016, using 54 trum cards, in which the number of each of the cards is calculated by dividing 7 pages by 7, using trum cards: the following numbers were the same as the same card or pattern, or the number of the cards in which the number is continuous is discarded to the floor, or the sum of the numbers of the cards in possession at the time the game ends, is the winner, and the hullar was the person with the largest sum of the numbers of the cards in possession at the time of the end. The hullar hullar hullar h in the order of one hundred to three thousand won per page to the winners.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the defendant, C, or H;

1. Each statement of H and I prepared;

1. A report on internal investigation (an investigation of the head of a Si/Gun/Gu as the head of a Si/Gun/Gu);

1. Relevant photographs (the defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the instant gambling is too excessive to the extent of temporary recreation.

In light of the following facts: (a) the developments leading up to the detection of the instant gambling, the form of the instant gambling site at the time of detection; (b) the place where the instant gambling was conducted; (c) the circumstances leading up to the instant gambling; (d) the Defendant’s methods of gambling and the size of the money; (e) the relationship between the participants in the instant gambling; and (e) the Defendant was subject to a disposition of suspension of indictment once for the crime of gambling, etc., it is difficult to deem that the instant gambling conducted by the Defendant was excessive to the extent of temporary entertainment.

Defendant

The above assertion by the defense counsel is not accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow