Defendants are innocent.

1. The Defendants in the facts charged of the instant case: (a) reported the network around Defendant A and Defendant B with a single hand against a female who cited handbag; and (b) the Defendant C considered the victim’s handbag in the so-called manner.

Defendant

C On January 5, 2017, around 01:55, at the top in front of the F Hospital in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Busan-do, and at the top in front of the F Hospital, and the name influort is discovered. Defendant A and Defendant B reported the network in their surroundings, and Defendant C attempted to take the handbags in the market price, but the victim was set up and did not take the wind to resist.

As a result, the Defendants jointly tried to steal another's property but did not commit any attempted crime.

2. The evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case is only G’s statement (the legal statement of the witness G and the police statement of the G in relation to G, the statement of the 112 reported by the said G in relation to the 112).

However, the witness G continued to return the strings at a few metres away from the string line to the string line and witness the string accurately.

(1) A witness cannot be deemed to have been able to believe that he was able to do so, and the witness was extremely able to

Even if at the time, it is clear that there is a limit in terms of accuracy in regards to the seeing through the taxi boom image (cd) and the back-hand glass (e.g., g., taxi booms) at the time of January 2.

그에 반하여, 피고인들은 피고인 C가 통화 중이 던 위 피해자를 약간 붙잡듯이 하여 말을 걸려고 하였으나 깜짝 놀란 피해 자가 소리를 지르며 지나갔다고

In addition, the witness asserts that he/she continued to take the way that the victim saw and brought about after the above crime. As such, the victim's response is more consistent with the above defense of the Defendants (if there is no new wall 2 cc.).