1. Defendant B’s KRW 15,400,000 as well as 5% per annum from February 16, 2009 to August 10, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a broadband service company, and the Defendant B served in the Plaintiff’s corporate business team, etc. from May 2009 to September 2012, and was in charge of the franchise store business and agency management, etc., and the Defendant C is an employee of the Dwork, who is the Plaintiff’s customer.

Nonparty E is a person who holds office as the director and the managing director of the Plaintiff’s corporate business division from August 200 to September 2012 and has overall control over franchise store business, agency management, etc.

B. On January 2009, Defendant B received a request from DD Corporation to “the Plaintiff Company’s agents refund KRW 45,620,000 in the form of management fees collected from certain DDF stores.”

Upon receipt of the report from Defendant B, “E sent a false statement to request funding necessary for computer development by talking on the side of the D Corporation, and prepare a letter of request that the funds be disbursed,” and Defendant B instructed Defendant C, who is an employee of D Corporation, to “I send a public document demanding that the Defendant C, who is an employee of D Corporation, bear the cost of KRW 70,000,000 from the side of the Plaintiff to develop the computer program,” and Defendant C created the above contents of the document accordingly.

Then, on February 11, 2009, Defendant B prepared a false statement to the effect that “D Corporation requires 150,000,000 won in developing a computer program at D Corporation’s office,” and that “the Plaintiff bears 70,000,000 won among them,” which Defendant C received from Defendant C, attached a false document to the written statement to the effect that “the joint request for the system development cost of the president’s name of D Corporation president” was made, and E obtained approval from the said document.

C. The above B.

After the process, 77,00,000 won, which is funds of the Plaintiff Company, including value-added tax, was transferred on February 16, 2009 to an account in the name of the Hadping Co., Ltd., a computer program development company.

[Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute;