The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant, as a taxi engineer, was waiting in the taxi platform to board customers on the taxi platform, and the victim C (the victim C) parked the vehicle on the taxi platform with her husband while parking the vehicle on the taxi platform, and after completing the work, the Defendant again deducted the vehicle from her husband, resulting in dispute with each other on the ground that the Defendant does not turn on the vehicle.

On October 2, 2017, at around 13:30, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by openly insulting the victim on the taxi platform under the department store high-class underground roadway, on the ground that the victim said that he “Isn't get off or go through a taxi driver or a person doing so,” and on the part of other taxi drivers, the Defendant reported that “Isn't occur due to a fluoring fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act.

C. Expression of intent to revoke a complaint: April 25, 2018, which was after the institution of the instant indictment, the written withdrawal of a complaint to this court on April 25, 2018

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;