logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2017.04.21 2016누6369
사업정지처분취소청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is as follows: Article 13(1)12 of the Petroleum Business Act, and Article 16(1) [Attachment Table 1] of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act, other than applying Article 13 of the Petroleum Business Act and Article 16(1) [Attachment Table 1] of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act, are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified as the conclusion is consistent with this, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow