beta
Text
The judgment below
Of the guilty parts and the list of offenses 1, 3-7 July 9, 2015, 9- C, D.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Of the acquittal portion of the lower judgment by misunderstanding the facts and legal principles (part of the part of the lower judgment’s acquittal), as to the violation of the Personal Information Protection Act by: (a) a person on December 11, 2015, 3-2015; (b) a person on March 3, 2016; (c) a person on May 12, 2016; (d) a person on May 12, 2016; (d) a third party on G vehicles’ E; (e) providing, divulging 6, 7, 8; and (e) a third party on G vehicles’ personal information; (e) leakage; and (g) a person on personal information from spreading; (e) a violation of the Personal Information Protection Act: (e) whether the relevant information constitutes multiple times; (g) whether the license is valid; (g) the amount of drinking control and fine; and (g) whether the person is a personal vehicle; and (g) a third party providing personal information; and (g)
In so determining, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and legal doctrine.
B. The sentence of the lower court (the guilty part and the acquittal part of the lower court) is deemed to be too uneasy and unfair.
2. Determination
A. As to the lower judgment subject to an appellate trial’s judgment, only the prosecutor filed an appeal against the part of the lower court’s acquittal, excluding the violation of the Personal Information Protection Act regarding the attached Table Nos. 1, 3-3-3, the first instance court’s order on July 9, 2015, the first instance court’s order on the part of the Defendant’s acquittal 1, 3-3-3, and D vehicles, the remainder of the acquittal and the part of the conviction excluding the above part of the acquittal that became final
B. (1) The appellate court shall judge ex officio on the grounds contained in the grounds for appeal, but it may decide ex officio on the grounds that affect the conclusion of the judgment, even where the grounds for appeal are not included in the grounds for appeal (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Do9576, Apr. 14, 201) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Do9576, Apr. 14, 201).