All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental statements in the grounds of appeal not timely filed).

For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court determined that the admissibility of the written evidence of the suspect interrogation protocol against Defendant B prepared by the prosecutor on March 15, 2017, based on the details and schedule of the text discovered from the voluntarily submitted mobile phone, and the contents of the schedule.

Examining the records in accordance with the relevant legal principles, the lower court’s judgment is justifiable.

There is no error by misapprehending the legal principles on admissibility of evidence.

In addition, examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, including the above evidence, it is justifiable to maintain the first instance judgment that found the Defendants guilty of all the charges on the grounds as stated in its reasoning.

In so doing, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the degree of proof, burden of proof, intent, and amount of bribe.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.