Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

Defendant

C The above fine.

Criminal facts

Defendant

A, from April 18, 2007, purchased grain from the farmers who are members of D and processed it through milling operations, etc., and was employed as the team leader of the victim D joint business corporation established for the purpose of storage and sale (hereinafter “victim D joint business corporation”) and was in charge of the purchase, processing, and sale of the grain of the damaged corporation. Defendant B was employed as the factory manager of the damaged corporation from the same date, and was in charge of the purchase, processing, packing, and storage of the corporation. Defendant C was engaged in the distribution and sale of grain in the trade name “F” as “F.

The period of regular purchase shall be about 35 days between the first police officer of October and the first police officer of November of each year for which drilling is terminated, and the additional purchase period shall be about 3 days during the period between June and July.

The purchase is carried out as a procedure for the input of dried (Measurement) data, and the purchased grain shall be stored in a place "tank" or stored in a metric machine, and the grain packaged after the purchase shall be loaded in a joint market in the damaged corporation and shipped out to each customer.

1. Fraud;

A. Defendant A and B, with the knowledge that the grain purchased as above is not put into a storage tank, and is stored in a ton shot machine, the Defendants conspired to re-intake them into a dried machine, and to electronically enter the measurement (measurement) and false purchase details, and to obtain the price by fraud.

From October 23, 2007 to November 28, 2014, the Defendants issued a certificate of receipt as if H et al. were engaged in cultivating rice and purchasing rice normally within the damaged corporation, on the ground that four persons, including H et al., Defendant A’s land, were false farmers, and issued a certificate of receipt as if H et al. were engaged in cultivating rice and purchasing rice normally, and reinjecting the grain purchased as above in the dried season.