logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.09.15 2017고합109
현주건조물방화등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant committed the following crimes in a state that the Defendant had no ability to discern things or make decisions due to the alcohol use disorder, spawn's symptoms, such as the state of damage to the ability to verify the reality of the exchange administration and the network, and the mental and symptoms by drugs, etc.

1. On March 25, 2017, from around 17:37 to 18:45 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) attached a fire to the instant building D. D. 203 of the Cheongju-si Office Building D; (b) a water that had been on the line of the instant building, under the influence of alcohol while under the influence of alcohol while drinking mixed alcohol, and the clothes, etc. that were on the television decoration of the living room were on the part of the instant building, to have it spread to the wall surface of the bed room and the mouth of the bed, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant, including the Defendant, destroyed the wall of the main line installed in the above building No. 203, which is owned by the victim E, which is used as a residence by 13 households including the Defendant, to ensure that the repair cost is approximately KRW 31,657,00.

2. On March 25, 2017, between around 19:00 and around 20:00, the Defendant attempted to extinguish the above office, which is the flelelelight building, by putting in the floor of the office, the flelelight gate, which was attached with the flelight flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flh in the office. However, the victim’s mother in the above office did not go against the Defendant’s hand and attempted to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to I;

1. Each police statement protocol against G, J and E (Evidence Nos. 5, 7, 10);

1. A detailed statement of the handling of reported cases in 112 and on-site photographs of each case (Evidence List 3.

arrow