logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2015.04.29 2015고단173
공갈등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, prosecution against assault and intimidation is instituted.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, who became aware of the victim C (the 16-year-old age) through her friendship, went together with the victim, and the victim was frighted with the victim, or the victim was frighted to do so.

1. Suppression;

A. On January 3, 2014, the Defendant saw that it would be done as soon as possible if the Defendant did not place the victim to the “F” around the E market located in Gyeongbuk-si, Chungcheongnam-si, the Defendant saw that it was frighted to the “F” as a dynamic horse and fright, and as a gift fright, “I will grow in the present time, so far as I will grow.”

As such, the Defendant got 120,000 won in cash from the victim who frightened the victim and frighten it.

B. In July of the same year, the Defendant saw that it would be time to complete the work at the H’s new point located in G at the same time in the same time as of July of the same year, and put the victim into a brupt, stating, “as soon as possible, the Defendant fash the victim “as soon as facing the fa

As such, the Defendant got the victim to attack, and let the victim frighten, pay 100,000 won out of the Defendant’s correspondence cost on the job, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

2. In May of the same year, the Defendant forced the victim to take the “IPC bank” in “IPC bank” located at the same time as D, with the victim’s “if the game character is put inside, it shall be discarded.”

As such, the Defendant had the victim frightened with the victim, and had the victim frighten with the victim fright, do an act for which the Defendant did not have any duty by having the victim conduct the game by linking the Defendant’s account with the Defendant’s online game with the character of the Defendant’s game.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of police statements made to C orO;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 324 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of conflict and the choice of imprisonment) and Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code and Article 38 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.

arrow