The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment) was too excessive and unfair, in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, including the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times due to the crime of drinking driving, and that the Defendant repeated the crime despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times due to the crime of drinking driving, it is not recognized that the Defendant’s punishment imposed by the lower court for the reasons indicated in its reasoning is too unreasonable.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the "Road Traffic Act" in Article 11 of the 2th sentence of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected as "the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 17371 of Jun. 9, 2020)" by ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.