logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.12.23 2016고정3610
산업안전보건법위반
Text

The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended separately.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

The Busan Urban Transit Corporation is a corporation that runs the urban railroad transport business with its head office located in 644-gil 20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

1. Although Defendant A’s business owner, as the end or opening part of the work launch and passage, has to be built with sufficient strengths to protect the safety distress, fences, vertical fall-off net or cover, etc., Defendant A failed to take safety measures, such as failing to install the safety distress at the vehicle cleaning channel (the height is 1.2m, 115.4m in length) at the vehicle office, as a result of the special supervision conducted on June 23, 2016.

2. The defendant A, an employee of the Busan Urban Transit Corporation, committed an act identical to the above Paragraph 1 in relation to the work of the defendant Busan Urban Transit Corporation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. F's certificate;

1. A report on the inspection of safety and health (integrated), such as manufacturing business, a report on the results of special supervision, and a corrective order;

1. Full certificate of the registered matters of the corporation, certificate of employment, and letter of designation of a person responsible for safety and health management;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 67 subparagraph 1 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, Article 23 (1) of the same Act, and Articles 71, 67 subparagraph 1 of the same Act, and Articles 23 (1) of the same Act, where a fine is selected, Defendant Busan Traffic Corporation:

1. Sentence Defendants: Fines of 500,000 won each;

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. The Defendants: (a) Defendant A has served as a principal offender under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act for not less than 25 years in good faith and received official commendation from the Prime Minister.

arrow