beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years and for two years and six months, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 23, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Composition and Activities of Organizations, etc.) at the Jeonju District Court Military Branch Branch on March 23, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 24, 2013.
【Basic Facts 1124, 【2017 Highest 1124】 Defendant A is a violent organization member of the YU market strike, and Defendant B was a sexual traffic woman, and the Defendants were living together from around 2015 to around 2015.
Defendant
B In the course of engaging in commercial sex acts on July 2016, after exchanging the victim D (33 tax, death on December 20, 2016) and the telephone number, the victim was aware of the fact that he was a middle school teacher while continuing to engage in commercial sex acts, and committed the following crimes by using it with the Defendant A.
[Criminal Facts]
1. On July 26, 2016, the Defendants made a false statement that “The Defendant sent a siren accident to the victim using Defendant B’s mobile phone text messages, and borrowed the vehicle repair cost and agreed money.”
However, in fact, the Defendants did not have any traffic accident and Defendant B did not have any intent or ability to repay money even if they borrowed money from the injured party, such as there was no particular income, except for the income accruing from sexual traffic.
The Defendants conspired to induce the victim as such and received KRW 2,050,00 from the victim to the NongHyup Bank account under Defendant B’s name on the same day, and received KRW 23,660,000 in total on seven occasions from the above day to August 3, 2016, such as the list of crimes (1) in attached Form No. 23,660,000.
2. The Defendants of attack and fraud, on the basis of the fact that the victim, who is a teacher, may lose his teaching position when he was discovered, sent a text message using his mobile phone, or Defendant A sent a text message as if the victim was Defendant B using his mobile phone.