The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for the accused is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are considered as follows: (a) the Defendant led the Defendant to all of the instant crimes; (b) furthermore, the Defendant voluntarily surrenders himself to the crimes listed in the annexed list of crimes Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 8 of the judgment of the court below, and actively cooperates with the Defendants in the investigation; (c) the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the same criminal record or fine; and (d) the Defendant’s family members who need support due to the Defendant’s detention are likely to suffer economic difficulties.

However, each of the crimes of this case is a case where each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant in collusion with D and H so that the officer of the council of occupants' representatives who deal with the affairs of selection of the operator of the apartment childcare center can be selected as the operator of the child care center by making an illegal solicitation that the person designated by him/her can be designated as the operator of the child care center. The council of occupants' representatives, etc. has harmed the fairness of the bidding by having the officer of the above council of occupants' representatives prepare the public tender notice and the grading table in favor of the person designated by the defendant in the bidding process for the selection of the operator of the apartment childcare center. As a result, the social trust in the fairness of the selection of the operator of the child care center is considerably damaged and the crime is not good, and the amount acquired by the defendant from the person selected as the operator of the child care center in the above crime is more than KRW 945 million,000,000,000,000 won, and the above expenses are likely to be paid at the user of the child care center.

Defendant. Other defendant.