A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:00 on April 4, 2012, the Defendant, while preparing for entering a university, was under the influence of alcohol after drinking E, F, G and alcohol that the Defendant came to know while drinking at the university, followed the Defendant’s desire to rape the female employees who had worked in the convenience store in which the Defendant had been in a normal time.

Defendant’s Month

5. At around 02:57, the victim of Chinese nationality, i.e., the victim I (n., 24 years of age), who works as a mixed at the H convenience store in the Suwon-si Suwon-si Suwon-si, called the victim's breath of the drinking-water drinking water, let the victim take out the drinking-water at the calculation unit, and let the victim take out the drinking-water before the above convenience store.

The Defendant saw the victim from behind the defect in which the victim intends to take drinking water from the above convenience store cooling, and sprinked the victim's arms by hand, and sprinked the victim's arms in order to ppuri them, and sprinked the victim's arms between several times, and sprinked the victim's arms, leading the victim to the above cooling house and the next warehouse.

The Defendant strongly resisted the victim’s face in the warehouse, such as fasting the Defendant, and the victim’s face was satisfed by drinking, and the victim’s sound was “onetime, or death kack kack,” and the victim’s face was prevented by gathering the cans of “oneumbbbs” on the warehouse floor, thereby making it impossible for the victim to resist.

The Defendant, as seen above, exceeded all the clothes put in custody after suppressing the victim’s resistance, and exceeded the victim’s chest by hand, and tried to put the victim’s chest into the victim’s sexual panty, and added the victim’s sexual panty into the victim’s sexual panty. However, the Defendant was found to have committed a crime against theJ, who delivered the examination of the victim’s convenience point, and did not commit an attempted crime.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to rape the victim.