1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. On February 23, 207, Gap evidence Nos. 1 (the defendant recognized the authenticity as the date for the second pleading of the trial, and revoked the defendant's signature portion by claiming that it was forged through the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement of grounds of appeal as of January 12, 2015. However, since there is no evidence to prove the establishment recognition as above is contrary to the truth and there is no error, the confession cancellation is invalid), Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3, and the whole purport of pleadings, comprehensively taking account of the facts as to the loan interest rate of KRW 4,00,000 to the defendant on 65.7% per annum, and the interest rate of KRW 20,00 and interest rate of KRW 20,000 were set at 30,000 per annum and interest rate of KRW 45.7% per annum, the defendant transferred the above loan to the plaintiff on December 31, 2009 to 2018, and notified the defendant of the above loan interest rate of KRW 218.16.218

2. The defendant's assertion that the defendant was exempted from the above loans from around September 2008, however, there is no evidence to acknowledge this. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is without merit.