logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2019.06.05 2019고단525
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On December 28, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Jung-gu District Court Goyang Branch on December 28, 2009, and a summary order of KRW 8 million for the same crime in the same court on May 20, 2015.

【Criminal Facts” around 01:50 on February 19, 2019, the Defendant driven a DNA car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.154% while under the influence of alcohol at approximately 10 meters near the roads of the C Burial located in Gyeyang-gu B.

Accordingly, the defendant was a person who violated the prohibition of drinking driving twice and driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statements of a drinking driver and report on the control of drinking driving;

1. A CCTV video-recording photograph;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry records, and duplicate of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order was that the Defendant had been sentenced to a fine twice due to drunk driving, but re-driving a motor vehicle.

On the other hand, it is against the defendant's wrong recognition.

Alongly, it was limited to a simple drinking driving without any human or material damage.

The punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of all the sentencing factors indicated in the pleadings of this case, such as the circumstances mentioned above, the driving distance, the blood alcohol concentration at the time, the time and distance between the crime of drinking alcohol and the crime of drinking alcohol in this case, the time distance between the crime of drinking alcohol in the past and the crime of drinking alcohol in this case, the age, character and conduct

arrow