Cases
2019Bodily injury caused by negligence, 370
Defendant
A 91. Symar
Prosecutor
Kim Jong-su (Lawsuits of Prosecution) and Kim Attempted (Trial)
Imposition of Judgment
August 13, 2019
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,00,00.
Defendant who has converted 100,000 won into one day when the above fine has not been paid;
shall be confined in a workhouse.
In order to order the provisional payment of an amount equivalent to the above fine.
Reasons
Criminal facts
피고인은 울산 남구 * * 길 00에 있는 ' ○○ ' 주점에서 종업원으로 근무하던 중 , 손님 들에게 생일파티 등 행사 중 불쇼 이벤트를 할 때에는 화재가 발생할 수 있어 차단막 을 설치하여 안전사고를 미연에 방지하고 이를 구경하는 손님들에게 불꽃이 옮겨 붙어 화상을 입을 우려가 있으므로 일정한 거리를 두고 관람하도록 하여야 할 주의의무가 있음에도 , 이를 게을리 한 채 2018 . 8 . 2 . 21 : 00경 위 주점에서 , 손님인 피해자 B ( 28세 ) 와 피해자의 일행들에게 테이블에 칵테일 잔을 거꾸로 세워 2층으로 탑을 쌓고 최상단 의 잔에 양주 ( 깔루아와 코인트루 ) 를 부은 후 불을 붙이고 그 위에 알코올 도수가 높은 양주인 바카디 ( 70도 ) 를 흘려 내릴 때 넘친 술에 불이 붙은 상태로 폭포수 같이 흘러내 리는 불쇼 이벤트를 하면서 위 바카디 양주를 칵테일 잔에 따를 때 불꽃이 양주병 안 으로 유입되어 알콜이 가열되면서 그 압력으로 약 1m의 불꽃이 뿜어져 나와 그 옆에 서 구경하던 피해자의 얼굴에 옮겨 붙게 하였다 .
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as images, head, face, and various parts of the subject (which need to be managed more than 3 to 6 months) of 26-day head and neck 2.
Summary of Evidence
Omission
Application of Statutes
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the selection of punishment for the crime;
Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of fines
1. Detention in a workhouse;
Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act
1. Order of provisional payment;
Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act
Reasons for sentencing
In addition to a fine once, there is no specific penalty power for the defendant, not only once a fine is imposed on the defendant, but also the degree of negligence of the person under consideration is less severe, and the part of the victim and the degree of injury are relatively heavy. Nevertheless, considering the fact that the defendant did not agree with the victim and did not make a serious effort to recover from damage, the amount of fine determined by the summary order is excessive and difficult, and there is no special sentencing factor or change in circumstances that may be newly considered after the summary order, and the punishment is determined as per the order by maintaining the amount of fine determined by the summary order as it is in accordance with the summary order.
Judges
Judges Jin-Spot