logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2015.01.21 2013고정709
위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 26, 2012, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath at the Changwon District Court Jinju Branch 202, Jinju Branch 202, the other party of Jinju-si, and the Plaintiff C (the president D) presented against Defendant E and six (6). After the Defendants’ agent’s appearance at the first F house, at the second G house, at the third H house, there was such price consultation at the third H house, and the third witness was present at the second and third H house, and the third witness was present at the meeting, the second and third witness was not present at the meeting, but the third party was not present at the meeting, and the difference between the parties was not present at the meeting, and the testimony of the Plaintiff’s agent “at the time of his testimony from the first to the third H,” the testimony of the Plaintiff’s agent was “at the time of his testimony from the first H’s meeting to the third 4th H,” and the testimony was “at the time of his testimony from the meeting.”

However, the defendant did not attend the third meeting above.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the protocol of examination of witness (the Changwon District Court Branch case No. 2011No. 6133);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion of the provisional payment order against the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the defendant only made an inaccurate statement due to an error in the course of making a statement according to his/her memory and did not make a false statement.

The Court is legally authorized by this Court.

arrow