The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of each of the facts charged in this case since the defendant did not interfere with the victim K, D, or E or interfere with the victim H, J, or L business, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the statements made by the victim D, J, and H investigative agency and the court of the court below that conform to the facts charged in the instant case are specifically and consistent, ② the CCTV video recording room supports the statements of the victims, ③ the Defendant may sufficiently recognize the facts that he attacked the victim K, D, E, or obstructed the victim H, J, and L business as stated in the judgment of the court below, and there is no error of law affecting the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding facts.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.