All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because each of the punishments (one-month suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor) declared by the lower court to the Defendants is too uneasible.

2. Although the Defendants committed the instant crime even though the Defendants had been suspended from indictment for the same crime in around 2012, there are circumstances where the Defendants again committed the instant crime. However, in view of the fact that the Defendants expressed an attitude against the Defendants to refrain from repeating the crime again, the Defendants agreed smoothly with the victims, the amount of damage caused by the instant crime is minor, there is no change in circumstances unfavorable to the sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment, and all other conditions of sentencing as indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendants’ age, character, character, environment, method of crime, circumstance after the sentence of the lower judgment, etc., the lower court’s respective punishment imposed on the Defendants may be determined as appropriate.

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.