1. The Defendant’s KRW 66,00,00 among KRW 69,463,392 and its money to the Plaintiff and KRW 66,00,00,000, respectively, shall be from August 22, 2014 to November 11, 2014.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant received the following general household loan from the Plaintiff.

On March 5, 2013, 2013, 66,00,00 won of loan, 66,000 won of loan extended on March 5, 2014, COX3.51% of loan interest rate for loan extended on March 5, 2014, COX3.51% of new handling amount, COX3.51% of interest rate for repayment due to natural delay, 6 months of interest rate for repayment repayment, 4% of interest rate for delay repayment due to natural delay, 17% of (applicable interest rate) and 17% in cases where overdue period is less than three months: (applicable interest rate) and 17%, whichever is lower between (applicable interest rate 9%) and 17%.

B. Since then, the Defendant was unable to repay the above loans to the Plaintiff, and the details of the outstanding principal and interest of loans and damages for delay as of August 21, 2014 are as follows, and the compensation rate for delay as of August 2014 is 15.14%.

【Grounds for Recognition: 69,463,392 won including the principal and interest of 66,00,000 won and delay damages, 3,463,392 won and interest of 69,463,392 won and interest of 66,40,00 won and interest of 66,463,392: Facts that there is no dispute between parties

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated by applying each ratio of 15.14% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, etc., from August 22, 2014 to November 11, 2014, as to total of 69,463,392 won, including the outstanding principal of the loan as of August 21, 2014, and the principal of the loan to KRW 66,00,000,000, out of the amount of the loan principal, from among the outstanding principal of the loan as of August 21, 2014, to the date of delivery of a duplicate of the complaint

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.